The fact that he wears a white suit, and begins the evening staring pensively out of the window, implies he is not quite as other men. Persistently and persuasively, he forces the other men to slowly reconsider and review the shaky case and eyewitness testimony against the endangered defendant.
He votes not guilty and what follows is a chain of events that will test the views, beliefs and thoughts of the other 11 members. The twelve jurors retire to the jury room, having been admonished that the defendant is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
It is easy to be mesmerized by this writing and acting, and miss the rare accomplishment of the camera-work. Sign in to vote. It also strikes me as bizarre that the accused boy's defence lawyer, admittedly a court appointee, never questioned the flimsily circumstantial case against him.
If however, there is no reasonable doubt, then you must in good conscience find the accused guilty. He had of course superb acting talent at his disposal although some of the most memorable performances are from the lesser players.
Most of what we see today is monologues pretending to be conversations. I urge you all, if you have not yet seen this film, please do so now.
Marshall and John Fiedler are among the other individuals caught in a situation that is much more difficult than it appears on the surface. Edward Binns A typical "working man," dull-witted, experiences difficulty in making up his own mind, a follower; probably a manual laborer or painter; respectful of older juror and willing to back up his words with fists  Juror 7: You can tell it was worked and worked and worried, going through several generations.
Juror 3 Lee J. All of these criteria were fulfilled. But, although it remains a humane and highly efficient piece of entertainment, it is also beginning to show its age. It is easy to be mesmerized by this writing and acting, and miss the rare accomplishment of the camera-work.
Do we have a filmmaker today who could do this. The frightened, teenaged defendant is on trial, as well as the jury and the American judicial system with its purported sense of infallibility, fairness and lack of bias.
Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Twelve Angry Men at schmidt-grafikdesign.com Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. 12 Angry Men study guide contains a biography of Reginald Rose, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.
Outstanding Henry Fonda jury classic is still relevant. Read Common Sense Media's 12 Angry Men review, age rating, and parents guide.
Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for Twelve Angry Men at schmidt-grafikdesign.com Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. The twelve angry men are the twelve jurors of a murder case.
An eighteen-year-old boy from a slum background is accused of stabbing his father to death and faces the electric chair if convicted. Eleven of the men believe the boy to be guilty; only one (Henry Fonda) has doubts. Parents need to know that 12 Angry Men is a gripping drama that makes much out of a simple situation (the ordinary deliberations of a jury) and setting (the room where they have been sequestered).
Jurors smoke cigarettes throughout the movie.Twelve angry men review